Collab OSCommons

← A Digital Pattern Language

Product Triedintelligencespacetime

People Stay Home

A person is not an event. Names cross last.

When a network can introduce one person to another, holding the tension between the meeting that creates the value and the contact details that are the most dangerous thing to cross, the design abstracts the person into a description, reveals to them who is asking, and lets what crosses expand one yes at a time. People can commune and discover each other, and the place gains dignified, equitable and honest.

Context

The child of Deliberate Release at its strictest setting, when the thing that would cross is a person. It applies wherever a system brokers intros, referrals, matches or contact between members of different groups, and it needs a trusted go-between on each side. In TrustFlow those are two stewards with an open bridge.

Tensions

  • "In the end, everything happens when two people meet" (24 Sep).
  • Contact details are the most sensitive thing that can cross.
  • Stewards can't hand-carry every intro forever.
  • Hidden: a network's value is its people, so platforms want the contacts.

Forces the design applies

  • abstract on abstract ↔ groundthe person, described without a name until both sides say yes
  • reveal on reveal ↔ obscureto the person described: who is asking, and why
  • expand on expand ↔ contractwhat crosses, one step per yes
  • relax on pressure ↔ relaxthe person's answer: a message, no account, and 'not now' costs nothing

Solution

An intro crosses in steps, and what crosses grows only as consent does. First a description, then a reason, then the person's own yes, then the asker's yes. Names cross last. The person answers from a message and needs no account.

The generative parameter is the order of crossing: how many steps, and who holds each one. What doesn't change is that names come last and the person described gives the deciding yes. TrustFlow's order:

 1 Signal     crosses: a description     (holder)
 2 Ask        crosses: the reason        (asker)
 3 Consent    crosses: a yes             (the member, from a message)
 4 Both yes   crosses: names, contact    (asker confirms)
 5 Made       crosses: a record          (both)

It differs from its parent in more than strictness. The dial has no "flows freely" setting for people, and nothing passes further: "Intro signals never travel further than this bridge." It is also Progressive Disclosure (a seed on the vault's list) applied to identity.

Acts

  • Strengthens: commune (the two people meet; the whole sequence exists for that), discover (the asker finds someone they could not have found alone).
  • Weakens: follow, the one-sided connection to a person who never agreed.
  • Gap this surfaced: consent and ask. Consent is the act this pattern is built around, and the act list can't name it. Second time it has come up (see Deliberate Release).

Qualities it gives the place

DignifiedEquitableHonest

Refuses

  • Contact harvesting Taking people's names and contacts beyond what they agreed to share.
  • Forced account creation gating action behind credentials that aren't actually needed

McLuhan check

  • Enhances: introductions at a scale stewards can't hand-carry.
  • Retrieves: the go-between and the double opt-in intro.
  • Obsolesces: the member directory and the "connect" button that reveals a profile.
  • Reverses into: a consent maze, five steps that take two hours instead of one minute, until intros die in the queue. TrustFlow already lists it as an open question: "The steward's part has to take a minute, not two hours."

Required companion: a machine may draft a step but never take one. "Consent comes from people, never from rules" (see Machine Carries, Human Judges).

Connections

Completes
Deliberate Release
Siblings
Meet Before You Flow, Summary, Not Data
Completed by
none yet
Not yet written
A Quiet No

Seen in

  • TrustFlow (v2 prototype; the contact-sharing flow was the 10/1 session's focus): "Five steps. What crosses grows only as consent does." The member's message ends: "Nothing about you has been shared. Would you like to meet?" When the answer is no: "Nothing personal crossed, and [the asker] was told only "not this time"."

Elsewhere

Precedents the double opt-in introduction (ask both people before connecting them) · the recruiter's blind profile (a candidate described without a name until they agree to go forward) · Craigslist's anonymized reply addresses

Tried. (one project, in prototype). The harvest marks it strong on its own. A second project, or a member who has actually received the message, would move it up the ladder.